Is Drug Screening Too Costly To Do Or Do Without? One Company Has The Answer!

The director of telemarketing operations at aCompensation Insurance.. Substance abusers are
financial services company looks out across histhree times more likely to use medical benefits
3600 square foot call center on a typical Mondaythan other employees.According to Edward Poole,
morning. "Look at all those empty chairs", hepresident and COO of OHS Health and Safety
laments. "It is sickly Monday and my partiers areServices Inc., in Costa Mesa, Calif., several
taking their usual unscheduled day long break".government and private industry studies
The problem of the "three day weekend" orconcluded that each drug user in the workplace
absenteeism in general doesn't just affect the"can cost an employer an average of
manager in this setting. What about the other$11,000-$13,000 annually." Despite studies and
80% of the work force who showed up? Theysurveys that indicate a significant number of
are now burdened with additional duties while fillingsubstance abusers hold jobs and work while under
the vacancies that have temporarilythe influence, Poole points out that many
developed.With the challenge of recruiting qualifiedemployers have an "it can't happen here" attitude
workers becoming more difficult all over theabout substance abuse in the workplace. "Once
nation, the last thing American businesses canthey get in there and implement a policy and start
afford is to have major portions of its existingtesting employees, they're usually very surprised
work force abusing drugs - on or off the job. Theby the results," he says.Poole tells the story of
truth is that most employees do not engage inone client who operated a small, local delivery
illicit drug use and most do not want to workservice. When a representative from OHS Health
side-by-side with drug abusers. A majority ofand Safety Services visited the business owner,
employees are parents who are concerned abouthe stated repeatedly that there was no reason to
the effects of drug abuse on their children, nowconduct drug testing in that workplace. After all,
and in the future. Given this profile of the typicalthe company had only 63 employees. After a
American workers, it is clear thatcouple of years of rebuffing them, the delivery
substance-abuse prevention can and should beservice owner called OHS to start up an
viewed as a common concern of both employersimmediate screening program. Apparently the
and employees.We interviewed one company thatcompany had a change of heart after observing
has recognized the true damage that drugs in theunusual behavior in their workforce. OHS showed
workplace causes and why it is still prevalent.up unannounced one day after performing roughly
Labwire, Inc. ( a Houston, Texas based developer45 days of drug free workplace education, and
of online security solutions, began addressing whatdid what's called a "sweep." They were going to
many medium and large size companies havetest every employee in the workplace.Nine people
consistently failed to address-the true costimmediately walked off the job. Says Poole, "One
effectiveness of their testing programs. "Whator two probably had deeply rooted beliefs in the
stops companies from being effective about drugright to privacy and all that crap, but it is probably
prevention in the workplace is the apparent costsafe to say that most of those nine employees
to do so", states Dexter Morris, President of thewould have tested positive." Out of the 54 who
company. "What most companies don'ttook the drug test, 19 tested positive for
understand is the wasted cost of NOT using themarijuana and several tested positive for cocaine
latest in technology management in handling suchas well. "The employer was shocked," says Poole,
issues," he added.Drug use in the workplace costs"Most employers have no clue how many
this country billions of dollars every year in lostemployees are working under the influence."Once
productivity, increased health problems anda company decides to confront its potential
workplace accidents, to say nothing of theworkplace issue regarding illicit drug use the
problems it causes us at the federal and stateproblem of finding the appropriate security
level with associated family problems. Contrary tocompany crops up. "There are a lot of companies
the typical portrayal of drug abusers, manyprofessing to have the expertise to address drug
apparently functional drug and alcohol abusersscreening issues", Morris cautions. "Just find out
manage to hold down full or part-time jobs,what their track record is and talk to some of
masking their destructive problem from theirtheir clients".Many companies are heading the
employers. In fact, over seventy four percent ofwarnings about drug abuse in the workplace.
all current illegal drug and heavy alcohol * usersAccording to data on companies that test
hold down some type of job. *(Those drinkingemployees, drug testing increased from twenty
five or more drinks per occasion on five or moreone and a half percent to almost eighty five
days in the 30 days preceding the survey).percent in one six year period - a two hundred
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, moreand fifty percent increase. Recent evidence
than 8 million Americans use some type of illegalsuggests that drug testing has now leveled off
substance.The overall cost of illicit drug abuse isand in fact has decreased slightly, but primarily
estimated to have been $160.7 billion in 2000, andamong medium businesses. National studies
69 percent of these costs are from productivityindicate that sixty six percent of the country's
losses due to drug-related illnesses and deaths.largest firms engage in some type of drug testing.
Reducing substance abuse positively impactsAmong Fortune 500 companies, during the late
America's economic landscape.Medium businesses1980s and early 1990s, drug testing likewise
bear the greatest burden of substance abusers.increased in use. For example, in 1985 about
Traditionally, larger employers participate ineighteen percent of Fortune 500 companies
drug-free workplace practices. As a result,tested their employees. The number increased to
medium to large employers who do not havea high point of forty percent by 1991. Among
drug free workplace policies in place are - inFortune 1000 firms, forty eight percent of
essence - adversely selected against in terms ofemployees are subject to drug testing."These are
the employees that are left to hire. Another thinggood trends overall", says Morris when asked
to note is that substance abusers will steer awayabout the increase in drug screening across the
from drug-free workplace companies. They willUS. The weakness in screening program
work for those businesses that don't have aadministrations (drug testing and background
policy or a program and where there is no drugscreens) by medium and large size businesses is
testing involved. Let's face it, no abuser wants tothe increasing focus of Labwire's business model.
be detected."The fact that medium and large size"We know what the solution is for tens of
companies are at greatest risk is why wethousands of companies, and we are it", concludes
developed our web-based employee screeningMorris. With companies like Labwire, who are
process. Any company can deploy this systembuilding affordable applications, coming onto the
inside of 30 days", says Morris confidently. "Inscene, maybe your call center manager will have
fact, we can train up to 100 human resourcebetter attendance on future Monday
people on how to use our system in only 60mornings.Laura Betterly
minutes online".Morris went on to say that justPress Direct International
the cost of workers compensation claims canDirect International is a global information web
bury a company.site providing indispensable information tailored for
Drug-using employees are 3.6 times more likelyprofessionals in the financial services, media and
to be involved in workplace accidents and fivecorporate markets. Our information is trusted and
times more likely to file a workers' compensationdrives decision making across the globe. We have
claim. Between thirty eight and fifty percent of alla reputation for speed, accuracy and freedom
workers' compensation claims are related tofrom bias.
substance abuse per the National Council on