| In the chapter of one of those articles, that | | | | views it, that makes no sense to compare |
| we were advised to read, an actually have | | | | these completely different spheres of |
| already read, the thesis matter is presented | | | | knowledge at hand. |
| is the following citation"is the social | | | | |
| sciences are really inferior as compared to | | | | In fact, there are many advantages when it |
| the natural ones?" During our discussions and | | | | comes to the essence and composition of the |
| regarding of facts, we concluded and | | | | natural sciences in comparison to the social |
| understood that the natural sciences really | | | | ones. But, these vantages no way can be |
| possess some kind of advantage to maximize in | | | | regarded during the superiority/inferiority |
| comparison to the social sciences. | | | | debate; this is already a ground for another |
| Nevertheless, as highlighted in the article | | | | discussion. It just should come forward as |
| at hand, these advantage points does not mean | | | | defiance from the part of the social studies |
| that the natural sciences are in some way | | | | to maximize and make the take the most |
| superior to the social ones in, maybe even on | | | | possible out of the available sources of the |
| the contrary and depending for whom. This is | | | | social sciences to comply and be as much as |
| because of the reason, as specified earlier; | | | | possible accustomed to the needs of the |
| one science no way can be an alternate or a | | | | modern society and what is really important |
| substitute of the other one. For the same | | | | to be applicable to real life and clear to |
| reason, as the creator of the current article | | | | the masses. |