| In the chapter of one of those articles, that we | | | | current article views it, that makes no sense to |
| were advised to read, an actually have already | | | | compare these completely different spheres of |
| read, the thesis matter is presented is the | | | | knowledge at hand. |
| following citation"is the social sciences are really | | | | In fact, there are many advantages when it |
| inferior as compared to the natural ones?" During | | | | comes to the essence and composition of the |
| our discussions and regarding of facts, we | | | | natural sciences in comparison to the social ones. |
| concluded and understood that the natural | | | | But, these vantages no way can be regarded |
| sciences really possess some kind of advantage | | | | during the superiority/inferiority debate; this is |
| to maximize in comparison to the social sciences. | | | | already a ground for another discussion. It just |
| Nevertheless, as highlighted in the article at hand, | | | | should come forward as defiance from the part |
| these advantage points does not mean that the | | | | of the social studies to maximize and make the |
| natural sciences are in some way superior to the | | | | take the most possible out of the available |
| social ones in, maybe even on the contrary and | | | | sources of the social sciences to comply and be |
| depending for whom. This is because of the | | | | as much as possible accustomed to the needs of |
| reason, as specified earlier; one science no way | | | | the modern society and what is really important |
| can be an alternate or a substitute of the other | | | | to be applicable to real life and clear to the |
| one. For the same reason, as the creator of the | | | | masses. |