Critique and Current Trends

Apart from its strength in structuring instruction,in the 1960s. The National Defense Education Act
the audio-lingual method has its limitations. Becauseof 1958 was the funding mechanism, and the
the basic teaching method is repetition, studentsimpetus for increased interest in foreign language
learn to reproduce many things but never createstudy to ensure national security came about
anything original or use patterns fluently in naturalduring the post-Sputnik, cold-war era.
speech situations. Mechanical drills of theLanguage students used the language laboratory
audio-lingual method have been criticized as boringfor drill-and-practice sessions that were
at all levels and judged to be counterproductivecharacteristic of the audio-lingual method's
when used beyond initial introduction to a newbehaviorist and structurallinguistic-oriented
structure.approach to good language habit formation via
Additional methods were needed to transitionimitation and memorization. The language
students from imitators to initiators of spokenlaboratory generally consisted of rows of stations,
communication, a detail that was ofteneach equipped with a headphone and a
overlooked by teachers in the audio-lingualmicrophone. Students listened, responded, listened
tradition. There was also a tendency to disregardto their recorded responses, and compared their
content while manipulating language.responses with a model response.
Because the method also relied heavily onThe teacher sat at a console at the front of the
advanced technologies of the time, includingroom, where he or she could listen in on individual
reel-to-reel tape recorders, movie projectors, andstudents and offer additional feedback or
language labs, the method created logisticalguidance. The audio-lingual method also introduced
problems for teachers in setting them up forimportant language learning tools, including visual
instruction and during occasions when thepresentations and the use of visual cues to elicit
equipment failed to function during instruction. Itslanguage.
weaknesses notwithstanding, the audio-lingualIn addition, it ushered in the use of a foreign
method introduced the technological age tolanguage in the classroom by both teacher and
bilingual education, ESL, and foreign-languagepupil, and the language employed was of greater
instructional practice, especially through theuse for practical purposes than for understanding
introduction of the language laboratory.the great masterpieces of the target language
Language laboratories were installed in many highculture in the target language.
schools and colleges throughout the United States