| Talking Word Processors | | | | no good for someone with dyslexia because they |
| In a previous article about dyslexia software I | | | | cannot be sure, without the arduous use of a spell |
| wrote about three pieces of software that | | | | check facility, that what they have written makes |
| supported a dyslexic user in working successfully | | | | any sense. With dyslexia, poor spelling skills |
| and competently with an ordinary word processor | | | | reinforce poor reading skills. It is a vicious circle |
| such as Microsoft Word. Well, in this article I want | | | | that is hard to break. The speech function in |
| to briefly examine slightly different software- | | | | these talking word processors offers light at the |
| talking word processors. This software would | | | | end of the tunnel because individual letters or |
| mostly suit children with dyslexia who are still in | | | | whole words are read out as they are typed. |
| primary education or people who have dyslexia in | | | | Sound is used to complement vision. |
| combination with other learning disabilities. The | | | | Much Less Typing |
| reason that I say this is because the talking | | | | Talking word processors such as Intellitalk 3, |
| versions are very different in their looks and their | | | | Write Outloud and Clicker 5 also support a person |
| functions than the mainstream versions. They | | | | with dyslexia effectively because words can be |
| look less complicated and sophisticated than their | | | | written and sentences can be made without the |
| mainstream rivals and they perform fewer | | | | need for much, if any, typing. I am not talking |
| functions. They are a perfect match for children | | | | here about word processors that allow to user to |
| with dyslexia who need a simpler interface and do | | | | dictate into them using speech to text facility. I |
| not care so much about looks! | | | | am referring to the grids of words that can be |
| Three Good Examples | | | | placed on the screen and can be added into a |
| The talking word processors that I want to | | | | document by the click of a mouse. |
| analyse in more detail are; Intellitalk 3, Write | | | | Much More Focus |
| Outloud and Clicker 5. This type of software | | | | The reason why this is so important to a child |
| were not just developed to meet the needs of | | | | with dyslexia is that word processing requires a |
| the dyslexic market. They were designed to | | | | range of individual skills being used at the same |
| cater for people (children especially) who have a | | | | time. It requires a user to multi task. The ability to |
| variety of learning difficulties. Yet for me they are | | | | spell words and to type them fluently are some |
| an excellent means of supporting a child with | | | | of the most important. On top of this, a person |
| dyslexia in a couple of respects. Any specialist | | | | must then think about what to say- how to |
| piece of software must make a person with a | | | | express yourself (and this is the most important |
| disability more independent in order to be truly | | | | skill.) Successful word processing requires these |
| considered great. Talking word processors do that | | | | skills to be combined correctly. The brain only has |
| because of they read text back to the user and, | | | | a fixed amount of concentration that it can |
| as already stated, they are much simpler to use | | | | allocate to a task and a dyslexic person will need |
| than something like Microsoft Word. | | | | to concentrate greatly on the spelling and typing |
| A Multi Sensory Approach | | | | probably at the great expense of the creative |
| Talking word processors can work so powerfully | | | | process of thinking what to say. Talking word |
| with people with dyslexia because they provide | | | | processors, by providing on screen grids to be |
| multi sensory support. A mainstream word | | | | accessed, allow more concentration to be used |
| processor, working on its own, only works | | | | where it is needed (in the creative writing |
| through one sense- vision. The user looks at the | | | | process) rather than on the dull mechanics of |
| screen and reads what they have written. That is | | | | spelling and typing. |