| As we begin to program artificial intelligence, which | | | | liberalism we are teaching humans and |
| will obviously in the near future surpass human | | | | programming our young to disregard stereotypes |
| intelligence it is amazing what some people are | | | | and prejudices. Isn't it interesting that when we |
| not realizing. We are teaching and programming | | | | wish to perform a task that has to be right the |
| artificial intelligence software programs to think | | | | largest percentage of the time to protect the |
| logically and systematically. | | | | people it is to serve that we will use an artificially |
| We put these systems and all sorts of robotic | | | | intelligent machine, which thinks counter to the |
| accessories from unmanned aerial vehicles to | | | | way that we are social engineering and our human |
| computers, which help us make decisions. We | | | | societies? |
| teach them to be rational and to make their | | | | It seems to me that this points to a problem with |
| decisions based on the input coming in from | | | | liberalism, socialism and the Democratic |
| sensors. The artificial intelligence programs pick the | | | | perspective. Does this mean that liberalism is a lie |
| best and most logical answer to a problem literally | | | | and we have to infect computers with artificial |
| by stereotyping, observing and using percentages, | | | | intelligence to prove it to us? Hey, don't shoot the |
| profiling and most probable guesses based on the | | | | messenger, as it is just an observation. Consider |
| input. | | | | this in 2006. |
| Now then, through social engineering, socialism and | | | | |