The Top Three Reasons Law Firms Are Not Using Digital Dictation Technology

In my profession, it is common to ask a lot oftape, it gets saved as an audio file (i.e., .wav, .dss).
questions. Truly, it's necessary. A Virtual AssistantUnlike speech recognition, digital dictation requires
is someone who has to know as much as possiblea transcriptionist and software to type the
about a particular client's systems or way ofrecorded thoughts.
doing things in order to best configure and makeBy the way, one reason why I firmly believe
use of available technology to help them do itspeech recognition software can never replace a
better, faster, for less cost -- whatever the clientgood legal secretary/transcriptionist - no matter
is looking to gain.how much you train it, it can never catch when
I started my VA career almost eight years agoyou say "defendant' and you should be saying
and limit my practice to virtual assistance to the"plaintiff"! ;)
legal industry. Over the years, I have asked manySo, while you may have heard or read about the
attorneys, law firm administrators, paralegals, HRpitfalls of speech recognition technology, digital
managers, private investigators, IT administrators,dictation is a different animal altogether.
managing partners, office managers, secretariesNumber 2: "If it ain't broke..."
and others about the processes used at theirYes, it is true that tape dictation works and has
firms. Some use document managementworked for decades, but so does a typewriter,
software, some don't. Some have websites,an abacus, even a compass for that matter.
some don't. Almost without fail, when asked whatUpgrading to digital dictation is not a fix, it is an
the attorneys use for dictation, the mostimprovement to a known process. It is the
common response: a tape recorder.natural evolution of dictation - from human being
That's good, because dictating is a very efficient(secy), to recorded (tape), to digital (sound file).
process, even with a tape. According toWhen upgrading to digital, what should be
Dictaphone, in 1952 recorded dictation washighlighted is that those making the recording no
established as "a time saver over handwriting andlonger need to be in the same physical location as
stenography among attorneys, physicians andthe person doing the transcribing - or in today's
other professionals". The first mini-cassettelingo: can work remotely! Depending on how the
recorder was marketed in 1973. Do you believecapture process is set up, so long as firm's
it? That same little recorder still in use at mostdictators have access to a telephone or the
firms in the US today is the technologicalinternet, they can produce billable time.
equivalent of listening to music on an 8 track!Since the dictation file created with digital is
In any event, if your firm uses tape basedelectronic in nature, it can be manipulated much
dictation, then it is already understood thatthe same as any other computer file -- stored,
recording actual firm work product is a good wayrouted through networks and so on. This makes
to get things done and if your firm does not usethe dictation file itself much more convenient and
dictation, perhaps you should be starting withuser friendly in today's electronic environment
digital so keep reading.(networks, multiple offices, document
Why Upgrade To Digital Dictation?management software, retention requirements).
Although not as old as dictation itself, digitalAlong with remote work opportunities for firm
dictation has been around for quite some time.dictators, upgrading to digital dictation provides
The medical profession has been using digitalreporting and tracking on each file as it travels
dictation technology (call in and portable recorders)through the process or all of the metrics that a
for over a decade. Why? Upgrading to a digitaltape based dictation system simply cannot
dictation process provided hospitals, clinics,provide. Hold up a tape and ask an attorney
doctor's offices and insurance companies with:owhat's on it and see what s/he says! If it were a
the ability for doctors to work remotely withdigital file, however, you always know the date
nothing more than a phone or portable recorderand time a file was created, by whom, how long
and internet connectiono centralization ofit is, what client it is for, what matter it pertains,
document workflow for multiple user, multiple siteand more.
operationso the ability to monitor work inSo, from an administrator's as well as dictator's
progress and overall productivityo the ability toperspective, upgrading to digital dictation provides
track and report various metrics and criteriao thequite an improvement for how the work gets
ability to utilize remote transcriptionists and savedone.and... my all time favorite response to...
on personnel costs"Why hasn't your firm upgraded to digital
The way I see it, any size firm has as much todictation?"
gain as a comparably sized medical practice byNumber 1: "We don't like change."
upgrading to a digital dictation process - so theI am not kidding! I have heard this exact phrase
question remains, with so much to gain, Whymore times than I care to admit!
haven't they!? (Read that list above again - withOther than, of course, this response helping me
your firm in mind.)to realize that firms can take forever to reach a
Why Aren't Firms Using Digital Dictation?decision, it presents quite a conundrum. Why?
The main reason, I believe, is no one has putWhen upgrading to digital, not much actually
2%2B2 together yet. Since digital dictationchanges in the process for the dictator. In fact,
technology isn't "new", not much attention hasOlympus and other major manufacturers even
been paid to it outside the medical industry. Justhave portable digital recorders in their professional
recently, however, British and other European lawline that have a slide switch. Truly, a digital
firms have been in the news discussing howrecorder which mimics an analog recorder's
upgrading to digital dictation has been easier andfunctions.
better than expected.Therefore, when properly configured, other than
What About Here in the US?the fact that an attorney does not have to get
Listed below (in reverse order) are the top threeup from his chair to hand a tape to his secretary
responses I have received over the years to the(or leave on her chair), when upgrading to digital,
question: "Why hasn't your firm upgraded to digitaldictators do not "do" anything different.
dictation?"Wrapping It All Up
Number 3: "Digital dictation, isn't that speechAt some point, every firm has to weigh the pros
recognition?"and cons of any technology upgrade. With more
No, speech recognition is not digital dictation.and more equipment and software necessary to
Speech recognition is software. It takes thestay competitive, no wonder no one is looking for
human voice and converts it to text. Speechanother "upgrade". Unlike so much of the
recognition software requires training to eachtechnology available today, however, digital
specific user - hours of training for mostdictation technology is not "new". It is very stable
applications, making the implementation of thisand has been robustly tested, successfully
technology not practical in most firm settings.implemented and utilized in various sized
Digital dictation is the recording of your voice withenvironments for over a decade.
software or equipment that provides dictationThis should, IMHO, make an upgrade to digital
functions - stop, rewind, insert and so forth. Withdictation a must for any firm's 2009 technology
digital, however, the recording does not go onto abudget.