What Masquerades as Leadership (but is Not)

In trying to understand leadership, it is a good ideatrust and he will never go beyond the core job
to take a brief look at some negative motivationalrequirements again.
techniques so that we understand what leadershipI was once made aware of a company that
is not. This list is by no means comprehensive; butmade a big deal out of the large bonuses that
it does include some of the most commonthey paid each year (and were planning for the
offences:o Leadership is not the absence ofcurrent year). Unfortunately for the team
guidance. Ken Blanchard has a great descriptionmembers those bonuses mysteriously shrank at
for this; He calls it "leave alone, zap." It describesthe end of each year. The company's executives
many managers who provide their staff withwere extremely creative at justifying reductions
absolutely no guidance; then they criticize themin bonuses. At the same time they were unable
the moment that they do not meet anto understand why the big bonus promises were
un-communicated set of expectations or theyless motivating year after year and morale in the
transgress over an invisible line that they had notorganization was low.o Leadership is not
been told about.threatening. More of the carrot and stick
This is often caused by a manager who does notphilosophy of motivation with special emphasis on
really know what s/he wants or what her/histhe stick. The thought process goes along the line
expectations are. S/He can't clearly articulateof, "If I threaten someone with the one thing that
what s/he wants in advance. S/He can onlythey are terrified of, it will motivate them to
criticize when something is done and it doesn'twork harder than they have ever done." The
"feel" right or when her/his incompetentthreat is usually along the lines of whether the
supervisor does the same thing to him.oemployee will have a future with the company or
Leadership is not a control freak. Control freakcareer opportunities within it.
management is the art of not letting a teamThis thought process just does not work. People
member do anything, almost to the point ofare not motivated by the threat of negative
breathing, without permission. Then no matterrepercussions; instead they subconsciously avoid
what the employee does, even with permission, itthe situation that the threat arose as part of. So
will be criticized. Control freaks feel they mustif I were to threaten an employee with
have direct authority and be in command oftermination because of a poor job s/he is more
absolutely everything. They have a need tolikely to avoid the task that was done poorly
criticize; almost compulsively. Even when theirrather than improve the performance.
staff performs a task exactly the way theyIf you want someone to avoid his job, threaten
were told to do the previous time they will stillhim about it.
find opportunities criticism. The work will neverIn one extreme case that I learned about, the
meet approval; therefore praise andpresident of a large company threatened to slit
encouragement is never given.the throat of an information technology team
Control freaks typically have three attributes inmember who was not "fixing his computer fast
common:enough." Now do you suppose that this threat
1. They genuinely believe that they are doingmotivated the IT person to work harder or
what is best for the people they are controlling.faster, or did it just frighten or upset him causing
Take note of this for yourself. Don't make thehim to focus on the threat instead of on the
mistake of believing that you are not overcomputer problem? Even if he was not afraid of
controlling because you have good intentions orthe physical violence it was still very insulting and
that your controlling nature is justified because ofde-motivating for the president to treat him this
your good intentions.way (not to mention a criminal act by threatening
2. They are insecure. They feel that they havedeath).
short comings and that the rest of the world isThis company president was one of the most
judging them. In order to protect themselvespathetic excuses for a leader that I have ever
from such judgments they resort to controllinghad the experience of meeting. He was a man
their environment and everyone/everything in it.who thrived on absolute power by controlling and
3. Control freaks focus on others and theirinstilling fear in employees.o Leadership is not
performance so that do not have to acknowledgeplaying political games. Save the politics for the
and address their own issues.leadership of countries. True leadership does not
I once had a manager who criticized me if I gotmanipulate people or situations in order to win
up from my desk to attend a meeting twofavour with others. Politics occurs when hidden
minutes before it was about to start because Iagendas collide and the individuals behind those
was wasting time. However she would also comeagendas behave in a subversive manner. A
to my desk at one minute before a meeting andperson will claim that he is fighting for the good of
exclaim, "Aren't you coming to the meeting?the company but really it's her/his own career
What are you waiting for?" No matter what I did,path that s/he is most concerned about. As
she criticized it. She was the classic example ofindicated earlier doing a good job as a leader is
someone who had to compulsively maintainthe way to get ahead, not politics.o Leadership is
control and it was mainly done through constantnot craving authority. Although authority is tied to
disapproval.position, leadership often is not. It is not the
The control freak is someone who is veryposition that inspires people, it is the character of
insecure. S/He is terrified that people will realizethe person doing the leading that either inspires or
her/his level of incompetence and judge her/himdetracts.o Leadership is not a power trip. There
(this is often imagined or magnified by theirare some individuals who strive for authority to
insecurities). S/He will strive to control everythingstroke their own egos (the previously mentioned
around her/him so this does not happen. For thepresident was such an individual). They may make
control freak, all of this happens at athemselves feel good, but they are not going to
sub-conscious level; the only conscious aspect ofbe motivating anyone else while doing so. They
it is "a knowledge" that the staff member isare usually transparent in their motive and not
incompetent and needs constant supervision inrespected or appreciated.
order to protect her/him for her/his own good.oI once had a director who liked to call 2 hour long
Leadership is not setting up staff to take the"emergency" staff meetings at 4:30 pm on
blame for failure. Many managers meticulouslyFridays. They turned out to be nothing more than
document their staffs' errors so that they havelong status meetings that involved her rambling on
evidence to prove that any problems were afor a couple of hours while she placed employees'
team member's fault and not their own. In fact, aweekends on hold. She obviously loved the feeling
good leader does two things that we will expandof power she got from it.
on further; they look for people doing things right,She did not realize that this behaviour cause her
not wrong, so that they can praise them andto lose her staff's respect. She quickly lost her
they (generally) accept the responsibility foropportunity to motivate them in a positive
failures and problems.o Leadership is not lyingmanner.
about future incentives. This is the carrot andThis is just a sampling of some of the worst
stick approach with emphasis on the carrot. Youways you can try to motivate someone.
can get people to stretch themselves in the shortObviously, if you do not want to stagnate your
term by offering them some incentives (such ascareer and alienate your staff you should avoid
bonuses, salary increases, or promotions);using any of these techniques.
however, if those incentives are not deliveredIf you want to excel in your career and positively
when they are earned, all credibility, both presentmotivate your staff then break out of your
and future, will be lost. You have just used thecomfort zone and start putting the leadership skills
employee and s/he will know it. He will know thatyou learn into practice.
the employer/employee relationship is not one of